Music Banter - View Single Post - Is Blues Based music too dominant.
View Single Post
Old 09-02-2015, 04:59 PM   #5 (permalink)
EPOCH6
V8s & 12 Bars
 
EPOCH6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: British Columbia
Posts: 955
Default

Like Willie Dixon said, "The blues is the roots; everything else is the fruits".
Of course that's exaggerated, considering the bounty of music that came before the blues, but in terms of post-early 20th century popular music? May as well be true.

The reason most popular music is rooted in blues is probably because the blues is easier to work with than classical, jazz, or ethnic styles. And that shouldn't be perceived as a negative comment towards any of these roots styles, it's just that blues is more accessible, generally it's easier to approach and easier to absorb, easier to learn (although as with anything, immensely difficult to master), and easier to extract and build from.

For most listeners and consumers that can't be bothered to dive deeper into genres, blues rooted music is the happy middle ground. Everything else is either too dense (classical, jazz, avant-garde etc), or too dumb (dance music, mainstream rap and hip-hop).
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bobbycob View Post
There's 3 reason why the Rolling Stones are better. I'm going to list them here. 1. Jimi Hendrix from Rolling Stones was a better guitarist then Jimmy Page 2. The bassist from Rolling Stones isn't dead 3. Rolling Stobes wrote Stairway to Heaven and The Ocean so we all know they are superior here.
EPOCH6 is offline   Reply With Quote