Quote:
Originally Posted by Pet_Sounds
Quick question for you, TH. Say someone recs an album like, oh, I dunno, Revolver, which has fourteen tracks, but clocks in at 35 minutes (the norm for most of the '60s). Is it acceptable?
Since Annabel Dream Reader has thirteen tracks, I assume it's been postponed, but I'll just wait for you to review it after Metal Month.  |
I think I'm more concerned about albums with more tracks than length, as like I mentioned I have to write a comment for each, so taking an album that runs for an hour but has ten tracks as opposed to one that runs for forty minutes but has thirty tracks, the latter gives me more work, so in that case I would come down on the side of the longer album. I may rethink this as I go along. For now, I think I've left your album on the list, as it just edges over the limit trackswise but is not longer than the limit.