Quote:
Originally Posted by Soulflower
It would be nice if you addressed what you disagreed with in a respectful way instead of being disrespectful and patronizing every time you disagree. This is not just with me because I notice you do the same to other members as if your font is some superior being and everyone is suppose to bow down to your opinion as law. I am not sure what stick you have up your ass or what your problem is but I am not putting up with your b.s.
Your encouragement thread is a joke when you have been disrespectful yourself here on occasions.
|
Last time I stand up for you
Quote:
Originally Posted by Soulflower
Troll hart was being condescending and he called me out my name and has been very disrespectful in the past.
He was looking for a clap back, so me being the person I am, I did.
|
I have absolutely no idea what that means. As to the part in red,
No I wasn't and the part in green yes I did, but that was in another thread. It wasn't cool and I apologise for it but you just refuse to listen to anyone once your mind is made up. Nevertheless that does not excuse it. It however does not by the same token entitle you to carry one insult through to further threads when it has not been repeated, and to make a case for my being that sort of person, which I am not.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Soulflower
Of course just look over the fact he called me an idiot but wants to make a thread about encouraging other members.
|
Completely pointless. Again, one moment of lost control and suddenly I can't make up for it by creating that thread?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Frownland
I must have missed that because I haven't seen him use that word. Like I said, believe what you will but I recommend taking my earlier advice of lightening up.
|
As I say, it wasn't in this thread.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Soulflower
If you don't see how that was condescending than I am at a lost for words.
He most definitely was being condescending.
Whats funny is some want to call me obnoxious but whats obnoxious and rude is calling someone an idiot and names just because you disagree with their opinion.
|
Here we go with muddying the waters. Again. The part about condescension seems to be inexplicable to anyone but you. The funny/pathetic thing about this is that I actually felt bad about insulting you in the other thread and thought I'll throw the old olive branch out here, and try to explain what I think she meant. Somehow that turns into condenscension?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Frownland
I hope they film the execution. Can we make it an ole timey hanging and televise it? I'm thinking they should send him to Utah so they can take him down by firing squad. That's close enough where I can take a bus and attend dressed in a shirt adorned with the American flag.
|
The thing is, I know you are serious about this. AND you'd provide the soundtrack wouldn't you? Make his last moments hell on Earth!
For those who don't know me, you should be aware that I am not the type who insults people. I try to maintain a sense of calm and maturity here. Most times I succeed but like anyone I can lose it. Soulflower you probably know now that I have been given a warning about that from the mods. That's fine, it's merited but I also know that it's merely a knee-jerk reaction to yourself having received a warning for the same thing. Tit for tat, but it's hardly the mature thing to do now is it? If I were warned or banned over something and knew others to have made the same error I would mention that others had done it, but I doubt I would point a finger at a particular member and say "What about him?" Just seems childish to me and a case of petty revenge.
Anyway, the point is that I wrote the post "like her usual posts" because this is quite true. Whenever someone misinterprets or does not understand one of your posts you invariably reply with "Didn't you read my post?" or some variant of that. Only when really pushed do you explain what you mean. If I write something and someone does not understand it I clarify it; I see no problem doing that, even if it was really clear in the first place. Sometimes how it sounds in your head is much different to how it comes out in the forum. But you never want to explain. You seem to think everyone should intuitively know what you're talking about, when sometimes it seems like even you don't. So when you replied to Chula's post about the "attractive boy" with "didn't you read my post?" this was just another example of your frankly inexplicable reluctance to explain anything you write, or clarify it. Chula was genuinely, so far as I could see, concerned you were trivialising or even glorifying this terrorist, and if someone had that idea then I would be as quick as I could to disabuse them of that notion, not write what to me is a very condescending post in itself.
But you do what you like. I won't be trying to defend you again, which is what I was doing, believe it or not, as everything I say seems to rile you up. I won't however stop pointing out when your posts make no sense, or need to be clarified, and I won't stop disagreeing with you when I think you're wrong. That, after all, is what a forum is all about, no?