Music Banter - View Single Post - Pointless sub genres
View Single Post
Old 11-27-2014, 01:49 AM   #42 (permalink)
Dylstew
Music Addict
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 1,366
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kedvesem View Post

I think someone mentioned this already, but the sub-genre that I despise the most (having nothing to do with its content, just the name) is "indie".

"Indie" is short for "independent", yes? So it's what? Independently released? Not on a big label? But that tells me NOTHING about the sound, only the marketing. And what if it isn't on a little label? Is it literally impossible for big labels to release indie music? I've also heard that "indie" is supposed to refer to music that sounds as if it could have been released on a small label (whatever that means), but then what about the worst, most useless label of all "indie pop"? That seems then to be a contradiction in terms, yet I have seen it used to describe various artists.

Why? Why is this a thing?
100% this, I've never understood it either.
Dylstew is offline   Reply With Quote