Quote:
Originally Posted by John Wilkes Booth
i don't vote either but i also know for a fact the way **** plays out, you being a good person to others will only make you a sucker and an easy victim so that **** would never work as an overall strategy. it's a nice thought but you'd have to get everyone to think it at the same time and that would require a pretty enormous amount of organization. my system wouldn't have voting. they would try to keep the populace reasonably comfortable and content because that'd really be necessary for the system to function efficiently but beyond that it doesn't really matter what the average person thinks should be done about any particular situation.
|

you so Above Average. How would your non-voting system (try to) decide to keep the populace reasonably comfortable? How would it define reasonable? You sound dumb as **** right now.