Music Banter - View Single Post - Animal Rights Disproving Itself
View Single Post
Old 11-01-2014, 07:44 PM   #73 (permalink)
John Wilkes Booth
Account Disabled
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 2,235
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Batlord View Post
Yeah, but the emotional fulfillment provided by food animals has nothing to do with them as living beings, but as... you know... food. So, by my logic there isn't reason to give them even the most basic protection that doesn't involve food safety.

And I don't know what specific laws are in regards to lizards, fish, spiders, etc, but I don't imagine they are as protected as animals, like cats and dogs, that are capable of more profound emotional connections with pet owners, and that are closer to what can be called sentience. Or at least those laws aren't exercised as rigorously.




As much as I would like to see this guy hurt, no, not by current standards I don't think a year in jail entirely makes sense (not that I'm going to lose any sleep over it). But someone like Michael Vick, yeah, put him away. If he done the same with people he would have been executed, so a year or two in prison certainly wouldn't have been out of proportion, and the kind of premeditated sadism he practiced is certainly miles away from a random act of cruelty.
i don't disagree we should discourage anti-social and psychotic behavior in general. to me vick should have just been shunned by society and stripped of his fortune and fame. but of course in this society you can't really do that. truth be told if i was in charge of **** things in general would be a little more USSR-ish.
John Wilkes Booth is offline   Reply With Quote