Music Banter - View Single Post - Why such controversy on Nu Metal?
View Single Post
Old 08-24-2014, 10:02 PM   #199 (permalink)
Musicfanatic
Music Addict
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 225
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Necro View Post
heck id even consider nu-metal a remote subgenre of hardcore
I don't know much about hardcore, but what I do know is that I think you might have a point. Some nu-metal is angst ridden, plus very screamy, and I do believe that that was some of what hardcore was about. Correct me if I'm wrong, any hardcore fans.

Quote:
Also, as a side note, i dont get how nu-metal being too simple is a problem for people, if anything it makes them sound hypocritical, cos those same people also happen to like ****in Beatles and if you hear a Beatles song with technical shredding and face-ripping riffs let me know.
Never heard of Revolution, or Helter Skelter? Both are pretty heavy.

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Batlord View Post
Naw, man. Black Flag is a myth.
That's hardcore? I bought My War by them. Is that still in the style? Is the Damned hardcore, or just punk?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dylstew View Post
Nah, there's way more controversy over Nu Metal. Do you see controversy over Thrash Metal, Black Metal
No to black metal? I think those church burnings across the lake were kind of controversial, and it had to do with black metal being taken too far...

Quote:
Do you see controversy over Hair/Glam Metal
Um, some, so yes.
Musicfanatic is offline   Reply With Quote