Quote:
Originally Posted by WhateverDude
Batlord and GB, you guys are still responding to my posts and going off on a tangent about religion. I made it explicitly clear in my first post that I don't believe in any of that, just that it's possible their may be a 'creator'. I'll go on to say that maybe not even a 'God', just fulfilling a similar role as far as our existing goes. S/he/it might not even be supernatual, just not described or imagined by humans.
It doesn't seem that far fetched, after all we can recreate the circumstances under which it is widely believed life first began. I think it's called primordial soup? Google brought this up too: Abiogenesis - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
My point is, it's a closed minded to write off the idea of God completely even if religion is mostly, imo, a bunch of hooplah. There's still the possibility of something else. |
Abiogenesis is a very interesting topic... and one of the many reasons to write off God(s). "Primordial soup" is often used as a pejorative by creationists; an attempt to trivialize the process. We should talk about abiogenesis instead of argue over the unfalsifiable plausibility of an invisible omnipotent omniscient creator of everything.