Quote:
|
Originally Posted by DontRunMeOver
Although again, 'morals' might seem a misnomer to other people if they involve saying that person A fits into category B because they do C when in fact there isn't any direct logical connection between items B and C.
|
By this I was using:
A = a girl
B = slutty behaviour
C = oral sex in general
In which you were saying that a girl who performs oral sex a lot is slutty. What I was saying is that its not reasonable to call a girl slutty purely for performing oral sex, however often this may occur, as it depends entirely on the context. This description DOES encompass, for example, a married woman who gives her husband oral sex every day and never has an other kind of sexual contact with anybody else. Of course, you may still view this as slutty, in which case I'm afraid I will have to continue finding your opinion on this matter to be silly.
That was the statement as you'd ACTUALLY written it to begin with. The implied meaning, which you pointed out later and which isn't obvious in the original post (as implications rarely carry through on the internet) would fit my 'logic' as:
A = a girl
B = slutty behaviour
C = giving lots of oral sex to lots of different men
So now you were saying that a girl who gives lots of oral sex to lots of different men is slutty. I have to agree with this, although even then I'd say it depends partly on the context...