Music Banter - View Single Post - Sly & The Family Stone
View Single Post
Old 09-03-2013, 11:49 AM   #34 (permalink)
Soulflower
Account Disabled
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 2,304
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gavin B. View Post
I've never heard that Michael Jackson attempted to return any publishing rights to Sly Stone. Jackson didn't need Sly's consent to return the publishing rights... all he needed to do was establish a trust fund in the name of Sylvester Stewart (Sly's real name) and relinquish his claim to Sly's songs and restore publishing rights to him.

Sly's catalog is fallen under the control of Sony International who agreed to form a joint venture with the Jackson estate
. Which means Michael Jackson's parents will be the primary beneficiaries but Sony will have firm control of the entire content of the Mijack music publishing empire because Jackson was plagued with debt at the time of his death.

Sony's control of Mijack is bad news for Sly or any other artist who wants to repurchase their publishing rights from the Sony entertainment consortium. Sly's back catalog produces at least 1 million dollars in mechanical publishing revenues and maybe another $500,000 in performance revenues per year.

Sony does not have FULL control over the catalogue.
The MJ Estate owns half of it. MJ's parents are not the beneficiaries of that catalogue, the MJ Estate Executives control that catalogue and MJ was in the talks of returning the catalogue to Sly which he had previously did for Little Richards musi. My guess is I think Sly wanted MJ have to h his music because he would make better investments with it but I agree as well that Sly should own his own music.
Soulflower is offline   Reply With Quote