Quote:
Originally Posted by sopsych
One-liners don't belong in this thread.
|
I was making an observation, which you obviously don't agree with based on this response.
Quote:
Originally Posted by sopsych
Okay, if Yac isn't the main man on technical decisions, who is, the corporate owners? Lessen our "ignorance." But as for new moderators, the idea isn't special negotiating powers on their part - technically, this site isn't bad, in my opinion. New moderators are for willingness to more strongly enforce rules against nastiness. A wide range of people in this thread have requested that policy change, but at least one moderator since seems to have more or less dismissed it and I suspect a few of them are the reason for the long status quo on that.
|
I'm not against bringing in new moderators. However, a complete overhaul of the team just for the sole reason that new moderators might be better at curbing bad behaviour and making the forum a better place is just a band aid fix. In the long run, nothing will get solved if members don't get involved in implementing changes as well. This is a community where everyone makes it what it is by participating. It's not an oppressive dictatorship.
As for the admins, well they are MIA as far as this site is concerned. We have to fend for ourselves here, unfortunately. Yac is basically our liaison with them, and he has a little more power than we do, but is not able to modify the technical aspects of the website. We just have to cope with this fact.