I don't understand your logic tbh.
Walcott has a good season and is now better than players who've been consistently good for years but you say you don't care about past seasons. If Walcott has a crap season next year what happens then, will Robben and Muller be better than him again?
Seems a very knee-jerk way of judging a player. Surely if you just mean 'now', then that would just mean he's in better form than those two. That wouldn't make him a better player.
Stats aside (and they are only decent this season), Walcott isn't a great footballer whilst the others are all proven. Robben is a better footballer than Theo is. Theo is quick and a decent finisher and not much else.
|