That last statement, that's not what I said. I clearly said that I don't believe all of this, meaning that when It really boils down to it, I don't believe it. I wouldn't put money or anything of value on it. I'm just not going to say that none of it happened, I think it very well could have.
Why is my statement about not caring if there is concrete evidence alarming? You never answered my question about believing that all historical occurrences are false unless there is no living evidence. Surely at some point in your life you were told some family stories by your parents or another family member. And most likely there is no other reason for you to believe those stories are true other than the fact that you trust this person. Obviously, trust isn't evidence. So do you think all of those stories are true or false? Is it "alarming" for you to believe that they were true? I know a typical family story isn't the same as claiming you we're visited by aliens, but nonetheless it's the same at its core -believing something that was communicated to you without being undeniably proven.
Last edited by blastingas10; 01-13-2013 at 07:52 PM.
|