Music Banter - View Single Post - 10 Reasons Why The Rolling Stones Were Better Than The Beatles
View Single Post
Old 10-09-2012, 02:31 PM   #533 (permalink)
Rock N' Roll Clown
Music Addict
 
Rock N' Roll Clown's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Bulgaria
Posts: 169
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Unknown Soldier View Post
I said that you were limiting things in naming three of the very biggest, as there were a host of other bands as equally as good and interesting. BTW the Clash are 1970s and late 1970s at that.

It depends on where you define the biggest, here in the UK they were probably the third biggest behind the Beatles and the Stones from that time.
I wanted to say Cream, I have no idea why I wrote The Clash.
There were very good bands, of course, but all I said was:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rock N' Roll Clown View Post
The Who just can't be as great as the Stones or the Beatles. They are the third greatest band of the 60s, though.
So, isn't that what you are saying? Maybe they aren't exactly at the 3rd place, but they are around there along with Doors and Beach Boys. Maybe our interpretations of the words "greatest" and "biggest" are different and that's why we can't understand each other.
__________________
Rock N' Roll Clown is offline   Reply With Quote