Music Banter - View Single Post - 10 Reasons Why The Rolling Stones Were Better Than The Beatles
Thread: 10 Reasons Why The Rolling Stones Were Better Than The Beatles
View Single Post
Old 10-09-2012, 02:12 PM   #532 (permalink)
Unknown Soldier
Horribly Creative
 
Unknown Soldier's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: London, The Big Smoke
Posts: 8,265
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rock N' Roll Clown View Post
Why should it be limited?! I couldn't understand you. Of course that they are the best. Along with The Beach Boys and The Doors (and maybe The Clash and The Velvet Underground and 2-3 others), that three are the greatest 60s bands (I am not counting The Jimi Hendrix Experience, Smokey Robinson and The Miracles and others act like these as bands).

Edit: I wouldn't say that The Who were among the three biggest bands of the 60s. In 69 they opened a concert for The Doors, so The Doors were "bigger" back then.
I said that you were limiting things in naming three of the very biggest, as there were a host of other bands as equally as good and interesting. BTW the Clash are 1970s and late 1970s at that.

It depends on where you define the biggest, here in the UK they were probably the third biggest behind the Beatles and the Stones from that time.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by eraser.time206 View Post
If you can't deal with the fact that there are 6+ billion people in the world and none of them think exactly the same that's not my problem. Just deal with it yourself or make actual conversation. This isn't a court and I'm not some poet or prophet that needs everything I say to be analytically critiqued.
Metal Wars

Power Metal

Pounding Decibels- A Hard and Heavy History
Unknown Soldier is offline   Reply With Quote