Quote:
Originally Posted by LoathsomePete
Here's a hypothetical question for the ladies of MB. Would you date a guy who fulfilled your emotional needs, but was uninterested in sex. Perhaps not to the point of unwilling to have it, but is open in his dissatisfaction with it. In effect he'd let you use his body for your own satisfaction, while not gaining any for himself, basically becoming a living sex toy that hogs the sheets and farts on your legs.
|
No, I don't think I could do that. I don't want to have sex with somebody who's not going to be into it as much as I am. Total emotional fulfillment for me
includes all aspects of sexuality (including kissing). If he's not interested in ANY part of sex at all, then he's not my boyfriend - he's my roommate. And if we're not living together, then he's in the friend zone.
Quote:
Originally Posted by jackhammer
Congrats for enjoying but if he's good then it should happen more often.
**** all the male bravado about how many times or who with etc if a man can get in a car and drive it at fifty for an hour and know WHEN to step on the gas to reach the speed limit instead of driving at eighty all the time and not stopping to enjoy the view then he has no appreciation of what he is driving.
Much more satisfying to reach the destination together.
Analogy over. Need to look at some views.
|
Well I think he's good, but then again I have nothing to compare with. I was a completely blank slate when I met him - hadn't kissed, hadn't had sex, hadn't even done any hand holding...