Oh, how the mighty have fallen!
Artiste: Suzanne Vega
Nationality: American
Album: Nine objects of desire
Year: 1996
Label: A&M
Genre: Folk rock
Tracks:Birth-day (Love made real)
Headshots
Caramel
Stockings
Casual match
Thin man
No cheap thrill
World before Columbus
Lolita
Honeymoon suite
Tombstone
My favourite plum
Chronological position: Fifth album
Familiarity: “Suzanne Vega”, “Solitude standing”
Initial impression: Kind of puts me in mind of a meeting between Simon and Gabriel...
Best track(s):No cheap thrill, World before Columbus
Worst track(s):Most of the rest of it, really.
Comments: Though I would certainly count myself a fan of Suzanne Vega, somehow I never got past her first two albums. Brilliant (each in different ways) as those two were, I just seemed to have drifted away from her music after that. Not a conscious decision I think, but maybe I got caught up in all the hype at the time, with her videos on MTV and her singles in the charts, and going to see her live: maybe it was all just oversaturation and when it was over, like a spent/selfish lover, I just rolled over and muttered “seeya” and left in the night. Not literally, you understand.
So here's my chance, now that I have her discography, to see what Suzanne got up to while I was away. By all accounts, she's still successful, highly-thought of and despite the fact that her albums no longer break the top ten --- a steady decline since “Solitude standing” almost hit the top slot back in 1987, with this one falling just outside the top forty --- she still shifts more than enough units to keep herself in the style to which, no doubt, she's become accustomed. But is there a reason for this fall in commercial popularity? Or did people (like, I have to admit, myself) just jump off the bandwagon after '87 and leave it trundling on, unconcerned as to where it went without them? Have we, to mix metaphors a little, missed the boat, and will I wonder, after listening to this album, why I stopped buying her records?
And do I
ever stop asking questions? Well, do I?
Two tracks in, and I'm already asking more questions. Where's the acoustic guitar? The folk aspect of her music that drew me to her initially? This all sounds a little too electric, a little too, well, pop for me. The lazy lounge of
Caramel sounds like it should be in some old forties movie, but it's better than what has gone before, with a certain Waits charm about the clarinet and bass, while
Stockings (who else could write a song about a woman wearing stockings and somehow not make it sound that sexual?) is a lot rockier, with hard guitar and pulsing bass and a sort of bossa-nova beat, with something of Neil Hannon's Divine Comedy in the melody, and some pretty wild trumpet, almost arabic style.
As I listen to this more I get the feeling (reinforced with each new track I hear) that this is not Vega's own music, but what some record execs feel she should be playing. I'm not saying she didn't write it, as I know she did, but it just doesn't have the same heart as her earlier work, at least for me. Other than the pretty distinctive voice, if I heard this on the radio I'd probably not recognise it as being her product. Maybe she was just trying other things, but this sounds more like an album written to try to get attention, hit singles, commercial success --- which is odd, considering she had her biggest success with “Solitude”. Maybe trying to recapture the genius of that album backfired? Either way, I'm only halfway through, but though it's not a terrible album, I really don't see me ever seeing this as a great one.
In fairness,
No cheap thrill comes closest to the sort of song I've come to expect from her, but it's very much in the minority, along with
World before Columbus, which
really goes back to her basic sound, and is in fact one of the few favourites I would have on this album. Sadly, after that, for me, it's downhill all the way. I feel after listening to this album that Vega is trying to sound like Waits, though of course that could just be me. Still... Maybe two objects of desire on this one, Suzy, never nine. Not for me, anyhow.
Overall impression: A little confused, if I'm honest, and somewhat disappointed.
Intention: I'm really not sure. Is all her music post-1987 like this?