Music Banter - View Single Post - 10 Reasons Why The Rolling Stones Were Better Than The Beatles

BastardofYoung · 06-29-2012, 02:58 PM

no, i just think he hit the nail on the head. One was innovative and one was just image over art.

To prefer The Stones to the The Beatles is fine, but to believe the former is better, in my mind, favoring image over art.

I like The Stones, but they never did anything unique or original. They had 8 great years to 40+ bad ones. The Beatles never made a bad album.

Think what you want, I like The Stones myself.... but they are not even close to the level of The Beatles.

I think what blasting said is spot on.

06-29-2012, 02:58 PM	#6 (permalink)
BastardofYoung Buzz Killjoy Join Date: May 2011 Location: Canada Posts: 2,692	no, i just think he hit the nail on the head. One was innovative and one was just image over art. To prefer The Stones to the The Beatles is fine, but to believe the former is better, in my mind, favoring image over art. I like The Stones, but they never did anything unique or original. They had 8 great years to 40+ bad ones. The Beatles never made a bad album. Think what you want, I like The Stones myself.... but they are not even close to the level of The Beatles. I think what blasting said is spot on. __________________ last.fm ‎"I hope that someday we will be able to put away our fears and prejudices and just laugh at people." - Jack Handey.