Quote:
|
Originally Posted by TheBig3KilledMyRainDog
I never said they were alot more rock than pop. But using that same statement, we could say thats a masked way of saying, The Beatles were conformist whores while the stones were honest.
I want to hold your hand? No no no, I want to **** you rotten.
The stones refused to change the lyrics to Satisfaction to appease the american public on live television. The Beatles had nothign as raw and honest, and as down in the dirt.
Yes I did say they lasted longer, the Beatles havn't been putting out music since what the early 70's maybe? The stones are really kicking there ass in that department.
|
The Beatles Conformist? =(, name one thing about sgt peppers lonely hearts club band that is conformist, that album broke every sacred rule in rock music, The Beatles could make heavy raw music when they wanted to, they did it with Helter Skelter, I Want You(Shes So Heavy) and Revolution...The reason the beatles broke up was because of creative differences of course, that and because John and Paul couldn't stand each other, they all had pretty good solo careers and are probably the only band in history where every established member went on to have a sucessful solo career, anyway i do agree with you that the stones are the better and greater "Rock N Roll" band...But i think theres more to Rock than just Rock N Roll.
