The last few posts in this thread are a good example. Look at tore's fact based arguments, utilizing solid evidence and presenting and adressing key points and issues you've raised.
Now look at the arguments of creationists. They consist of telling people how ignorant they are, making broad assumptions and illogical leaps to conclusions, using quotes out of context, talking about moral implications, assaulting character, and insisting upon the same points of evidence to support their case, almost as if by rote, over and over again in a cycle.
If evolution is such a ridiculous notion, it should be easy to challenge scientifically. Not socially, not morally, not historically.
|