Just noticed this thread and have to say the thing that motivates the average film-goer with horrors is that they expect to be scared and expect the cliched endings etc. As something of a horror movie buff, I usually don't expect to be scared and neither do I have any real interest in the plot or script or care about the film's budget, what I do expect though is great atmosphere, use of camera, low budget and a cheesy element from time to time.
The first two series of horror movies that I fell in love with were the Universal horrors of the 1930s and 1940. These films were based on great stories, early quality sequels, great acting Bela Lugosi and Boris Karloff with some very special supporting actors as well. These films had limited budgets, as Universal was one of the poorer studios, but what these films had in common were great atmosphere and that feel that a legend was being born. The 1940s also gave birth to the Val Lewton fims, recommended to any horror fan with their fantastic use of camera and use of shadows. The horror wasn't often visible but was there just under the surface.
The Hammer films along with the AIP and Amicus studios basically brought the horror genre back to life in the late 1950s through to the early 1970s and this time in glorious colour, the films are largely classics, interesting and very clever plots basically horrors were never this good again.
The late 70s gave way to the slasher flicks which are all great movies but unfortunately these films set the precedent for what movie goers today still expect and that is to be scared witless regardless of what else the film may provide. I find modern horrors very hit and miss.
|