Quote:
Originally Posted by RVCA
I don't know why I bother arguing with you, it has played out the same way in the past as it is now
> I point out some logical inconsistency (calling Santorum the least dishonorable of the candidates) in your statements, back it up with evidence
> You fall back to generalized statements that don't address the particular objection at hand, usually resorting to comments that are thinly-veiled personal attacks ("I have a job", "I know more than you about politics"... seriously, of what use is it to say things like this?)
As for cavorting off to another thread, what's the point? Why can't you just do it here? Show me I'm wrong, and that Santorum is "not dishonorable" as you earlier claimed.
|
I have a job wasn't an insult, its why I didn't read your link. I said "I know more about politics than you do" because you told me I didn't know what I was talking about. Which, for the record, is a pretty dickish statement on your part. You started this fight and now you're painting me as the jerk. I don't know why you can't act like an adult.
Also, I don't know how me finding him the most honorable candidate can be proven to be "illogical." Opinions aren't logical and I still stand by my statement. Maybe we see things differently, and I think thats fine, but to make a statement like "its illogical" is not only incorrect, its uncivilized and rude.