Music Banter - View Single Post - Should rock be considered prog just because it's technical?
View Single Post
Old 11-16-2011, 03:34 PM   #21 (permalink)
Guybrush
Juicious Maximus III
 
Guybrush's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Scabb Island
Posts: 6,525
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ericbfg View Post
I feel that the characteristics I have set out are some of the things that people like Roine Stolt, phideaux xavier, Andy Tillison and others like Steven Wilson and Michael Akerfeldt amongst others, are pushing to ensure that the prog genre is a definable music genre. They have helped to make the prog scene what it is today, with it's own monthly magazine.
For much of the prog I listen to, those elements are not really very good descriptors at all. Going by that list, Mighty Rhapsody is probably more prog than most of the prog I listen to!

Something that further complicates any want to rigidly define a genre like prog rock as anything is that once a band is considered prog, that label is also generally applied to much of that band's output, often even when it doesn't contain those elements.
__________________
Something Completely Different
Guybrush is offline   Reply With Quote