Really, they impose a full ban on female but don't even limit male? That seems a bit odd. It's obvious that even though male circumcision has many issues it's still not as harmful, but I fully agree that it shouldn't ever, ever be performed on young boys unless there's an emergency that calls for it and nothing else.
Just to add the closest I have to personal experience, I know a boy who was circumcised just a couple of weeks ago. I didn't pry in to why (I'm amazed he even told me really) but I think it was something medical. If it wasn't, he was sixteen so capable of making a decision himself.
|