Music Banter - View Single Post - Should rock be considered prog just because it's technical?
View Single Post
Old 09-24-2011, 10:09 AM   #6 (permalink)
Necromancer
Divination
 
Necromancer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 2,655
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SIRIUSB View Post
I would add that all these 'labels' are very plastic in that they change per generation.
For instance R&B began as a form of the delta blues, but instead of accompanying yourself on say guitar ala Son House, you had a rhythm player, hence Rythm AND Blues, then it became a form of Soul music, and now we see it as a form of Rap/HipHop today.

Somebody should reattach the 'Blues' to today's R&B mix and have a HipHop Delta thing. I've recorded stuff that gets close to this, but I'm not well versed enough in today's commercial culture to get it right.
I like the hip-hop Delta ideal..maybe if you added a little Louisiana Cajun to it?

I remember when "Classical Rock" (not classic) was just a label to categorize the band YES.

"Opera Rock" - Queen.
Necromancer is offline   Reply With Quote