Music Banter - View Single Post - 10 Reasons Why The Rolling Stones Were Better Than The Beatles
View Single Post
Old 05-02-2011, 09:25 PM   #331 (permalink)
Burning Down
The Music Guru.
 
Burning Down's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Beyond the Wall
Posts: 4,858
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BastardofYoung View Post
I think The Beatles are the better of the two personally. In many ways, The Stones just followed in The Beatles footprint. "Their Satanic Majesties Request" for example was no more than their attempt at recreating "Sgt.Pepper...." and much of their output was like that.

While I like the Stones, I think The Beatles will always be the better group. The Stones to me were always more image over art, while The Beatles were really into all aspects.

"Under My Thumb" is one of my favorite songs, but when looking at The Stones as a whole, I think they have more failure than success to their name.

I appreciate both bands in their own right, but to say they were better than The Beatles is a bold statement.

But different strokes I suppose.
Really? I know that having a career as long as the Stones have had means that there will be some low points along the way, but I don't think their successes are outweighed by failure. Certainly not in terms of albums.
Burning Down is offline   Reply With Quote