|
Register | Blogging | Today's Posts | Search |
View Poll Results: Who is less terrible? | |||
Nickelback | 7 | 16.28% | |
Slipknot | 36 | 83.72% | |
Voters: 43. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
03-23-2014, 08:38 AM | #1 (permalink) |
cooler commie than elph
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: In a hole, help
Posts: 2,811
|
Nickelback vs Slipknot
A friend of mine asked "who's the worst, Nickelback or Slipknot? What's the most repetitive and unoriginal?"
We decided to ask you guys which band you think is the better, or least bad. It seems to me that Nickelback is to rock as Slipknot is to metal, and vice versa.
__________________
|
03-23-2014, 09:00 AM | #6 (permalink) | |
Horribly Creative
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: London, The Big Smoke
Posts: 8,265
|
Nice thread even if these type of threads end up being a troll's delight. I'm sure we're going to get a fanboy of either of these two bands on here saying how they're the best thing since sliced bread.
__________________
Quote:
Power Metal Pounding Decibels- A Hard and Heavy History |
|
03-23-2014, 10:41 AM | #9 (permalink) |
David Hasselhoff
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Back in Portland, OR
Posts: 3,681
|
Again, I don't think the first Slipknot album is that bad. Their problem was that the '90's ended.
Nickelback OTOH is just dreadful throughout. |
03-23-2014, 10:57 AM | #10 (permalink) |
SOPHIE FOREVER
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: East of the Southern North American West
Posts: 35,541
|
I listened to both bands when they were popular (and I was 8 or so) but have since outgrown them. With that being said, I still like a few tracks off of Iowa still so Slipknot gets my vote.
__________________
Studies show that when a given norm is changed in the face of the unchanging, the remaining contradictions will parallel the truth. |
|