|
Register | Blogging | Today's Posts | Search |
View Poll Results: How would you rank the album? | |||
Horrible! | 0 | 0% | |
Bad | 0 | 0% | |
Mediocre | 1 | 12.50% | |
Good | 1 | 12.50% | |
Very good | 5 | 62.50% | |
Brilliant! | 1 | 12.50% | |
Voters: 8. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
01-10-2011, 04:53 AM | #1 (permalink) | |
Juicious Maximus III
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Scabb Island
Posts: 6,525
|
Soft Machine - Fourth (1971)
This thread is for discussing the album Fourth by the Canterbury band Soft Machine. It was 2011's first homework album in the prog & fusion album club.
Quote:
__________________
Something Completely Different |
|
01-10-2011, 08:44 AM | #3 (permalink) | ||
Certified H00d Classic
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Bernie Sanders's yacht
Posts: 6,129
|
Check your PM box comrade.
__________________
Anteater's 21 Fav Albums Of 2020 Anteater's Daily Tune Roulette Quote:
Quote:
|
||
01-10-2011, 09:23 AM | #4 (permalink) |
Juicious Maximus III
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Scabb Island
Posts: 6,525
|
This became my favourite Soft Machine album after the first listen
Before this one, I was mostly familiar with Third. Something that bugged me with Third was the low production quality. I hope it's not just my copy, but it sounds like they've put woolen socks over the mics. The production on Fourth is a lot better sounding in my opinion. The album was immediately catchy and attention grabbing right from the start (teeth). For me, I think this might just be the perfect entry-album into Soft Machine. Perhaps I should've attempted this one before tackling Third. Very good!
__________________
Something Completely Different |
01-10-2011, 12:08 PM | #5 (permalink) |
\/ GOD
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Nowhere...
Posts: 2,179
|
I personally really liked this. Apparently Soft Machine decided to go even jazzier from Third with this one. Which is a good thing, but also it's biggest flaw. I liked it a lot but it lacks a lot of the really distinguishing characteristics that the earlier albums(Namely Soft Machine II) had. However, with that said, this is the only real flaw, and it's a damn good album none-the-less.
I especially liked the extended final track. Albeit not traditionally a Jazz band I feel Soft Machine puts out what is a damn fantastic jazz album that might not be up to the very best efforts of say, Miles Davis, but generally comparable to some of the works of most of even the better jazz masters. Only thing that notches this away from being perfect is the fact it lacks the distinctiveness of other earlier Soft Machine works. |
01-10-2011, 12:10 PM | #6 (permalink) |
Juicious Maximus III
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Scabb Island
Posts: 6,525
|
And Mike Ratledge just looks so cool on the album cover
__________________
Something Completely Different |
01-11-2011, 06:25 AM | #7 (permalink) |
Stoned and Jammin' Out
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Northern California; Eugene, OR; mobile
Posts: 1,602
|
I am going to have to give an explanation for my mediocre vote, pun intended. But not at the moment. Pardon me.
But in short, it didn't grab me as it seemed to for you folks. I'll be back... |
01-12-2011, 09:01 AM | #8 (permalink) | |
Still Crazy Nutso!
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: California, USA
Posts: 148
|
Quote:
Before I tackle this, what's your opinion on the first album? |
|
|