|
Register | Blogging | Today's Posts | Search |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
10-11-2014, 10:55 PM | #1 (permalink) |
moon lake inc.
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Detroit
Posts: 2,125
|
What is music, what is not?
There have been many bands that have pushed the boundaries of what we consider to be music, and many people have also put music into a box of what it can and cannot be. So my question to you fellow music lovers is where is the line drawn? When do we say music has to stop evolving? And just what defines something that is indeed pushing the boundaries. Is music all forms of audio, or does it go farther, or in fact are these types of audio-stimuli but into boxes that may not be broken?
|
10-12-2014, 07:55 AM | #5 (permalink) | |
.
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: .
Posts: 7,201
|
Quote:
Generally I noticed, that people mostly resort to the "that's not music" argument to denounce music they simply don't like. I think that's a strange way of thinking. You don't have to categorize things to not like them. |
|
10-12-2014, 08:11 AM | #6 (permalink) | |
Mate, Spawn & Die
Join Date: May 2007
Location: The Rapping Community
Posts: 24,593
|
Quote:
And I agree with you about people trying to invalidate music they don't like by saying it's not music. It's kind of a weird phenomenon, similar to the "that's not art" accusation. Strangely you never really hear people describe movies they don't like as not being movies or books they don't like as not being books. |
|
10-12-2014, 08:15 AM | #7 (permalink) | |
.
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: .
Posts: 7,201
|
Quote:
Perhaps the reason is, that "book" is tied to the physical (or lately also digital) object and movies to the act of filming, while music and art can't be that easily tied to anything. |
|
10-12-2014, 09:42 AM | #10 (permalink) | |
Fck Ths Thngs
Join Date: May 2014
Location: NJ
Posts: 6,261
|
Quote:
|
|